Ep 3392b – SC Immunity Ruling, Trump Got What He Needed, Not What You Think, Got Popcorn
https://rumble.com/v54yuzf-ep.-3392b-sc-immunity-ruling-trump-got-what-he-needed-not-what-you-think-go.html
The [DS] just received a huge blow. The SC ruled in favor of official immunity. Trump got what he wanted, the cases that Biden has brought against them should be dismissed but more than that, Trump can now go after the [DS] for unofficial acts. Grab the popcorn because now it is open season the [DS] players. Their crimes are going to be brought out into the light.

Trump Reacts To Supreme Court Decision To Limit Obstruction Charges Against January 6 Defendants


Supreme Court Overturns ‘Chevron Doctrine,’ Curtailing Federal Government Power
https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/supreme-court-overturns-chevron-doctrine-curtailing-federal-government-power-5659507?src_src=Morningbrief&src_cmp=mb-2024-06-29&est=AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAc%2BEkeh0J2pCYvpMDrWsXCLt3euFThIsZ7njlOgysV3MoCA%3D%3D
The 40-year-old doctrine has provided a legal foundation for the modern administrative state.

The Supreme Court in a vote of 6–3 overturned the Chevron deference doctrine, a bureaucracy-empowering judicial doctrine that critics say led to the explosive growth of the U.S. government in recent decades.

The new decision will make it more difficult for unelected government officials to generate new regulations.

For years, the doctrine forced judges to defer to the legal interpretations of federal agency officials who enforced federal laws they deemed ambiguous.

Supreme Court Rules Cities Can Ban Homeless Sleeping Outside
https://www.dailysignal.com/2024/06/28/prewrite-supreme-court-rules-oregon-homelessness-case/

The decision was 6-3. The Supreme Court ruled on the constitutionality of ordinances in Grants Pass, a city in southwest Oregon with a population of about 40,000, that fines homeless people for using blankets, pillows, or cardboard boxes while sleeping in public within city limits.

Over 300 Jan. 6 riot convictions now in peril after Supreme Court rules on obstruction charge
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/january-6-rioter-obstruction-supreme-court-b2565985.html

More than 330 Jan. 6 rioters could have their convictions and sentences tossed thanks to a ruling from the Supreme Court on Friday.

In a 6-3 decision, the court ruled that an “obstruction of an official proceeding” charge brought against Joseph Fischer, a former police officer and rioter, was too broadly used and the government will need to prove that a defendant “impaired the availability or integrity for use in an official proceeding of records, documents, objects, or other things used in an official proceeding, or attempted to do so.”

Chief Justice John Roberts, who delivered the majority opinion, used the example of eating lunch at the zoo to explain the ruling.

“To see why, consider a straightforward example. A zoo might post a sign that reads, ‘do not pet, feed, yell or throw objects at the animals, or otherwise disturb them.’ If a visitor eats lunch in front of a hungry gorilla, or talks to a friend near its enclosure, has he obeyed the regulation?

“Surely yes. Although the smell of human food or the sound of voices might well disturb gorillas, the specific examples of impermissible conduct all involve direct interaction with and harassment of the zoo animals. Merely eating or talking is so unlike the examples that the zoo provided that it would be implausible to assume those activities were prohibited, even if literally covered by the language,” he wrote.