JUAN O SAVIN- President Trump the Genius - NINO 3 30 2025
https://rumble.com/v6rjcsn-juan-o-savin-president-trump-the-genius-nino-3-30-2025.html
This is important for a couple of items. The statement of Juan's about the three levels of importance for a Military operation and the Genius of President Trump. As this is really having a profound effect on the rest of us.
If we can't find a definition to these things you are left in the dark as to why they were said. This is what Grok says (best search engine ever and will replace Google and its awful ads and algorithms)
In a scenario with two groups in active conflict, one group could be considered a "secondary party" or a "co-party", meaning they are involved in the conflict but not directly opposing the other primary parties, potentially supporting one side.
Here's a more detailed breakdown:
Primary Parties: These are the groups directly involved in the conflict, opposing each other and having a direct stake in the outcome.
Secondary Parties/Co-parties: These groups may have an indirect stake in the conflict, often acting as allies or sympathizers to one of the primary parties, but are not direct adversaries. Active Troop Participation: A secondary warring party could be a state actor who actively participates in the conflict with troops to support one of the primary parties. Co-belligerents: Traditionally, states fighting on the same side of a war have been referred to as "co-belligerents".
Example:
Imagine a scenario where two groups are in conflict over resources. A third group could be a secondary party, siding with one of the primary groups and providing support, such as supplies or manpower, without directly engaging in combat with the other primary group.
The other thing is it is boring with one page of content through most of this first part of the program. Nino posted after the YT Q & A here: https://rumble.com/v6res3k-juan-o-savin-topics-of-the-day-q-and-a-with-nino-3-29-2025.html
And what I just put up that has a really good visual of the Yeman conflict: https://rumble.com/v6rj7dt-juan-o-savin-act-of-war-by-old-school-films-3-29-2025.html
And you can see the second part to this program here: https://rumble.com/v6rhd8l-juan-o-savin-to-whom-much-is-given-much-will-be-required-nino-3-30-2025.html
And the basis for Kash Patel saying he has arrest coming soon https://rumble.com/v6req20-kash-patel-president-nayib-bukele-julian-assange-what-we-face-in-the-coming.html
PLEASE know that everything is in BITS AND PIECES right now. Trying to keep up is an every day fight. I have three nice venues to share updates and specifically Juans work. Playlists are here if you want to research his work with certain Podcasters https://rumble.com/c/JUANOSAVINPRESENTATIONS/playlists
and besides this channel please sub and become an active member on X.com
https://x.com/JuanOSavin107
and on Telegram https://t.me/JUANOSAVIN107

Pauline Eggermont
rpoStondesa6g67ugi5501mg2193tt7l9accam1h1h5959t05lhff4im7436 ·
HUMAN RIGHTS - WHAT ABOUT OUR HUMAN RIGHTS
Human rights lawyers and in particular Lord Hermer the Attorney General seem only to see human rights as being valid for everyone but the British People. As our country is swamped by people who actually have no legal right to be here, we are led by the nose by rich Human Rights Lawyers who appear to be so far removed from reality they are dinosaurs! As Britain creaks and splinters and is financially broken, socially damaged and losing its identity people like our Attorney-General should be recognised as being a massive danger to Britain and dismissed immediately! He and his kind are unrealistic and dangerous because the world has changed and they have not even noticed!
Lord Hermer says that Sir Keir Starmer’s support for the European human rights system is unequivocal and there you have it! Whatever fine words Starmer uses he has no intention of stopping illegal immigration or deporting illegal immigrants. He boasted recently that under his government that had returned over 20k back to where they came from, he did not however say they had mostly volunteered to return and we paid their fare!!
Lord Hermer stated that the Council of Europe was created under the leadership of Winston Churchill, so that is supposed to shut us up? Do we really need to point out to him that the world was a different place then that after the war the British people had little, worked hard, valued honesty and decency and set about building a safe country for its own people. Churchill would be appalled at the mess made today by people like our so called Attorney-General aided by our Prime Minister and his cabinet.
Human rights are apparently not meant to include British People, we do not benefit from them but we pay the price for allowing our own abuse and the abuse of our country. We are sidelined by the Starmer's and Hermers of this world. We are invisible.
These are apparently the people whose human rights must be accepted without question...the case of an Albanian criminal jailed for more than three years for running a cannabis factory who avoided deportation after asylum tribunal appeal judges ruled that it would deprive his daughter of a “male role model”, and a Polish drug dealer allowed to stay in the country because he claimed not to be able to speak his native language...and the ugly foolishness continues.

BREAKING: SUPREME COURT RESPONDS TO TRUMP AS ACTIVIST JUDGE BOASBERG ISSUES NEW RULING!


⚖️ TRUMP VS. THE DEEP STATE COURTS—AGAIN. In this critical update, we break down how President Trump is once again facing obstruction from radical activist Judge James Boasberg and pro-open border Senate Democrats who seem to value the rights of alien criminals over the safety of American citizens. Now, Trump is taking the fight to the top—officially petitioning the U.S. Supreme Court to intervene in the Alien Enemies Act case. This is a defining legal moment to determine whether President Trump is fully within his constitutional authority to protect the homeland. 🔥 Alien Enemies Act Showdown Heats Up 🔥 🔹 Senate Democrats Protest at Gitmo—Defending Foreign Detainees Over Americans Five Democrat senators made headlines by protesting at Guantanamo Bay, opposing Trump’s policies and advocating for the rights of foreign detainees while ignoring the safety concerns of American citizens. 🔹 Judge Boasberg Extends Block on Alien Enemies Act Implementation Obama-appointed Judge James Boasberg has once again interfered, extending his order that blocks Trump from deporting or detaining foreign nationals under the Alien Enemies Act. It’s another blatant act of judicial activism. 🔹 Trump Petitions Supreme Court to Settle Alien Enemies Act Power Once and for All In response, President Trump has filed an emergency appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, asking them to restore his lawful authority under the Alien Enemies Act. This is about presidential powers, national security, and constitutional clarity. 🔹 No Trial Needed Under U.S. Law to Enforce the Alien Enemies Act According to longstanding U.S. law, the Alien Enemies Act allows the president to act without trial in cases of foreign threats. Trump is following legal precedent, but the activist bench is trying to rewrite the Constitution from the bench. ⚠️ The Big Picture: A Legal War for Presidential Power & National Security ⚠️ This case is bigger than politics—it’s about whether the president of the United States can defend the nation against foreign threats without being blocked by unelected activist judges. The outcome of this battle at the Supreme Court could shape the balance of power between the executive and judiciary for generations. 🔔 SUBSCRIBE for real-time America First updates, legal analysis, and bold commentary you won’t hear on mainstream media.

BREAKING: SUPREME COURT RESPONDS TO TRUMP AS ACTIVIST JUDGE BOASBERG ISSUES NEW RULING!


⚖️ TRUMP VS. THE DEEP STATE COURTS—AGAIN. In this critical update, we break down how President Trump is once again facing obstruction from radical activist Judge James Boasberg and pro-open border Senate Democrats who seem to value the rights of alien criminals over the safety of American citizens. Now, Trump is taking the fight to the top—officially petitioning the U.S. Supreme Court to intervene in the Alien Enemies Act case. This is a defining legal moment to determine whether President Trump is fully within his constitutional authority to protect the homeland. 🔥 Alien Enemies Act Showdown Heats Up 🔥 🔹 Senate Democrats Protest at Gitmo—Defending Foreign Detainees Over Americans Five Democrat senators made headlines by protesting at Guantanamo Bay, opposing Trump’s policies and advocating for the rights of foreign detainees while ignoring the safety concerns of American citizens. 🔹 Judge Boasberg Extends Block on Alien Enemies Act Implementation Obama-appointed Judge James Boasberg has once again interfered, extending his order that blocks Trump from deporting or detaining foreign nationals under the Alien Enemies Act. It’s another blatant act of judicial activism. 🔹 Trump Petitions Supreme Court to Settle Alien Enemies Act Power Once and for All In response, President Trump has filed an emergency appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, asking them to restore his lawful authority under the Alien Enemies Act. This is about presidential powers, national security, and constitutional clarity. 🔹 No Trial Needed Under U.S. Law to Enforce the Alien Enemies Act According to longstanding U.S. law, the Alien Enemies Act allows the president to act without trial in cases of foreign threats. Trump is following legal precedent, but the activist bench is trying to rewrite the Constitution from the bench. ⚠️ The Big Picture: A Legal War for Presidential Power & National Security ⚠️ This case is bigger than politics—it’s about whether the president of the United States can defend the nation against foreign threats without being blocked by unelected activist judges. The outcome of this battle at the Supreme Court could shape the balance of power between the executive and judiciary for generations. 🔔 SUBSCRIBE for real-time America First updates, legal analysis, and bold commentary you won’t hear on mainstream media.

Victor Davis Hanson: Strategy to Trump China on the World Stage


President Donald Trump is right to be worried about China’s trade surplus, military expansion, influence in regions like Panama and the Arctic, and the broader global impact of its rise. Victor Davis Hanson breaks down the reasons why Trump has made maintaining dominance over China a central issue for his administration on this episode of “Victor Davis Hanson: In His Own Words.” “He’s worried that China is intimidating countries in the Pacific and in Asia. Some of our strongest friends—Australia, South Korea, Taiwan, the Philippines, Vietnam. Saying things like, "The United States is in decline. You better cut a deal. “  We don’t look at productivity in stocks but whether they’re politically correct or DEI and woke… The Chinese love it. We will not be competitive.”