It’s a start: 28 percent of Americans claim that the COVID crisis strengthened their religious faith and 41 percent claim that it strengthened family bonds. If only that percentage might increase.
https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2021/01/27/more-americans-than-people-in-other-advanced-economies-say-covid-19-has-strengthened-religious-faith/#:~:text=A%20similar%20pattern%20occurs%20in,as%20do%2049%25%20of%20Americans.

More lower courts rebel against the overthrow of Roe .v. Wade.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/judge-temporarily-blocks-wyoming-abortion-ban/ar-AA101P64?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=ae52ae6c8cec45cf86b1354e5e3001f1

Sarah Haines and her lies about the pro-life movement in her response to Congressman Matt Gaetz’s rebuke to pro-abortion activists.
https://libertyonenews.com/whats-this-nonsense-on-the-view-nobodys-pro-abortion-but-everyone-is-pro-life/

1. The View’s Sarah Haines claims that professing pro-lifers are willing to eliminate the life of a mother in order to “save a clump of cells.” Granted that some pregnant women can and do experience pregnancy complications that can be life threatening but if there are to be such risks, they generally do not occur until the later trimesters and under such circumstances, a mother is not sacrificed against her own will. If she is to die in order for her baby to be saved, she is the one who makes that choice, not the physicians tending to her.

It must also be noted that not long after conception, it has been undeniably demonstrated that the fetus is not a clump of cells but a baby in development. Even medical doctors have challenged the propagated notion that a fetus is nothing more than a clump of cells at the moment of conception.
https://www.lifenews.com/2022/07/25/doctor-says-life-begins-at-conception-thats-a-scientific-fact/

2. Haines goes on to preposterously claim that everyone is pro-life. If that were so, then abortion would not be an issue.

3. She also makes another preposterous claim that no one thinks that abortion is murder but if that were so, then what would be the point of a pro-life movement? Apparently a lot of people DO think abortion is murder. Even some advocates for abortion have admitted that abortion is the killing of a baby.


And finally, the irony of her closing statements:


“So many of us are concerned about people that don’t have a voice. They don’t have the agency to speak up. They need power. They need a platform.”


Does that include the unborn as well? They don’t have a voice. They don’t have the agency to speak up.

In the midst of a sports industry gone “woke,” this one is a ray of sunshine and a breath of fresh air.
https://www.christianpost.com/news/sydney-mclaughlin-breaks-her-own-world-record-credits-god.html

Though the extinct T. Rex being a conglomeration of fossils belonging several different dinosaurs is most unlikely, discoveries of specimens practically identical to T. Rex have no doubt been propagated by the scientific community as being unique discoveries different from the T. Rex (i.e. Gorgosaurus and Albertosaurus) when in all actuality they were just more fossils of a T. Rex or a variant thereof.

It is likely no different with a lot of other trumpeted fossil discoveries which have turned out to be practically nothing more than fossils of previously discovered extinct animals.
https://scitechdaily.com/bold-theory-that-t-rex-was-3-species-rebutted-tyrannosaurus-rex-remains-the-one-true-king-of-the-dinosaurs/

Evolutionists have long propagated that presently living creatures, including mankind, possess what are called vestigial or “useless” organs which they claim to be carry-overs from evolutionary ancestors in whom they may have once served a function but no longer do in living descendants.

This claim has been thoroughly discredited, however, as it turns out that virtually every so-called vestigial organ does in fact have a function and a use more vitally important than previously thought for the survival and proper function of those living thing which possess them.

In the case of fossils, such as the small arms of the T. Rex, there is no knowing as to what their function might have been as no one in recent history has ever seen, let alone observed, the habits, functions, and behavior of a T. Rex. There have been many theories as to what function the small arms of the T. Rex might have served, but none that have been proposed have been able to provide a satisfying explanation. It is possible that the small arms may have served a purpose in the early stages of the life of a T. Rex but became useless as the animal matured.
https://www.app.pan.pl/archive/published/app67/app009212021.pdf

Based upon the latest fossil discoveries, the legend of the Loch Ness Monster may have more of a basis in fact than previously thought.

[Even if Plesiosaurs no longer presently exist in Loch Ness, that doesn’t mean that there had not once been at some time in history, including recent history.]
https://scitechdaily.com/new-plesiosaur-fossil-discovery-what-it-means-for-the-loch-ness-monster/

If a million or more MAGA adherents were to donate at least a dollar a month to help pay for Trump’s legal fees and finance his campaign activity, he wouldn’t need anything from the NRC.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/07/gop-threatens-president-trump-announces-running-2024-gop-will-stop-paying-legal-fees/?utm_source=Gab&utm_campaign=websitesharingbuttons

Then there is no reason for the people to have any respect for them.
https://spencerfernando.com/2022/07/27/establishment-press-continues-to-show-contempt-for-canadians/

This CCP shill can go [screw] himself.
https://thecountersignal.com/who-calls-for-global-censorship-to-combat-misinformation/